In the last posts, I focused solely on work-related stuff.
I will keep doing this in the future, however one occasional, off-topic post doesn’t hurt.
In fact, it’s cross-pollination, and diverse topics, that stimulate creativity and interest.
(p.s. remember that there is a monthly newsletter, if you like love what I write)
Today I’m writing about “car ownership”, as a consequence of something that I’ve read a few minutes ago.
Look at this figure below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/371ca/371ca74515b27f064a4625b02d7dfc681fc08909" alt=""
The article concludes with “A new paper from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argues that the number of cars per capita is a better way than income alone to track the size of the middle class.”
My humble, personal opinion is that this is a wrong conclusion.
Italy doesn’t have a bigger (in percentage) middle class than Germany.
I believe that there are other factors that determine this outcome: public transportation; quality and quantity of roads available; fuel costs; average size of cities. Examples? Italy has a public transport system that is usually considered not as good as the German one; has higher fuel costs, less roads, comparable quality; more numerous, but smaller cities compared to Germany.
What’s your view? Why do you think Italy is ranked #1?
Do you think it’s a good thing, or a bad thing?
I’m a fan of car sharing, being eco-friendly, and public transportation, whenever they make sense. I personally would like to see less cars on roads, and a better use of these cars.